Thanks All for the DevOps scenario discussion.

Out of DevOps scenario discussion, One thing I observed, There needs to be 
a mechanism to pass on context from one automation to next in chain.
Bad example but lets assume Build Automation might define a variable say 
BuildId=AutomationBuild_20111209_0106 and that could be consumed say by 
test Automation to also set build context  when run test execution.
I am not advocating to spec out possible variable names, but in general an 
standard way to hand over environment variable from one automation 
execution to another. 

I understand providers can support own custom shape for configuration 
data, but environment variable is something very standard across all 
domains and would be useful if scoped under Automation spec. That way 
client can easily connect execution of two automation (workflow) in 
sequence for any type of automation domain or specific implementation.

Regards, 
___________________________________________________________________________ 

-|- Pramod K Chandoria 


Advisory Software Engineer

IBM Rational, India Software Lab 

Bangalore, India | +91-80-417-77045 | +91 99805 68253 
What's new | Ask Question in forum | Online Help | Download RQM 3.0.1 






From:   Michael F Fiedler <[email protected]>
To:     [email protected]
Date:   12/07/2011 11:34 PM
Subject:        [Oslc-Automation] Reminder: OSLC Automation workgroup 
meeting tomorrow at 1PM Eastern US + homework assignment
Sent by:        [email protected]




The agenda for tomorrow's meeting is here:
http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/AutomationMeetings20111208

The main topic will be a review of deployment and DevOps scenarios.
Please take a few minutes to review them before the meeting:

http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/AutomationDevOps

Regards,
Mike

Michael Fiedler
IBM Rational Software
[email protected]
919-254-4170


_______________________________________________
Oslc-Automation mailing list
[email protected]
http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-automation_open-services.net



Reply via email to