Makes sense to me. Regards, David ____________________________________________________ David Brauneis STSM, Rational Software Delivery Automation Chief Architect email: [email protected] | phone: 720-395-5659 | mobile: 919-656-0874
From: John Arwe/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS To: [email protected], Date: 09/12/2012 02:02 PM Subject: Re: [Oslc-Automation] AutomationResult / hasContribution property name Sent by: [email protected] no objections Best Regards, John Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario From: Paul McMahan/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS To: [email protected] Date: 09/12/2012 01:52 PM Subject: [Oslc-Automation] AutomationResult / hasContribution property name Sent by: [email protected] The verbNoun format of the "hasContribution" property seems like an anomaly among the other properties which don't use the verbNoun format. Those other properties are: state, desiredState, verdict, inputParameter, and outputParameter. It also seems like the name for a Boolean property but its actually not. Perhaps the name of this property should just be "contribution" instead? Best wishes, Paul McMahan IBM Rational _______________________________________________ Oslc-Automation mailing list [email protected] http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-automation_open-services.net _______________________________________________ Oslc-Automation mailing list [email protected] http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-automation_open-services.net
