I have provisionally updated the spec [1] to adopt the new language. Please comment on this list if you have concerns or disagree with the wording or compliance requirement.
[1] - http://open-services.net/wiki/automation/OSLC-Automation-Specification-Version-2.0/#Compliance Regards, Mike Michael Fiedler IBM Rational Software [email protected] 919-254-4170 "Oslc-Automation" <[email protected]> wrote on 10/31/2012 07:50:57 AM: > John Arwe/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS > Sent by: "Oslc-Automation" <[email protected]> > > 10/31/2012 07:50 AM > > To > > [email protected], > > cc > > Subject > > [Oslc-Automation] New MUST in Core > > This [1] is *probably* not a big deal, but it does imply we need to > update the compliance table at the beginning of the spec. > > I propose we simply accept the Core MUST without change. > > [1] http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/ > 2012-October/001506.html > Best Regards, John > > Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages > Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario > _______________________________________________ > Oslc-Automation mailing list > [email protected] > http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-automation_open-services.net
