Do we have an agenda for the 4th April meeting? (The time's not particularly convenient for me this week, but I can make it at a squeeze - depending on what ends up on the agenda.)
Following on from last week's discussion on temporary deployment & tear down scenarios, something we need to follow up on is identifying the wider scenarios and which ones we want to support. Negligent clients (who do not deregister their interest when done). This is partially addressed at the end of this scenario's page on the wiki. Are there any further scenarios that could use a "Client" resource on the service provider? Scenarios using composed automation requests - where one request simply kicks off other requests (possible on other providers). This scenario could cause particular problems when a third party registers interest in one of those "child" deployed resources, as then: We don't want to tear down that particular resource when the parent one finishes - we want to wait for the third party to finish. We don't want to tear down any deployed resources that that particular one depends on. This leads us into: dependency modelling (using the Common IT Resource Type Vocabulary), and the scenarios that would use it. Also worth considering provider-to-provider relations, as we need to be able to look up "dependsOn" relationships from other providers to the resources in this provider. I believe that there is work in the core WG about this sort of thing. So something we could do is: Identify scenarios in these areas Decide which ones we want to support/consider Flesh the scenarios out (I'm not sure of the order of the last two.) Some of this should probably be done on the mailing list, rather than in the meeting. Martin Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
