I see this excerpt in a few places, I think always "right" after a link to appendix A. It made me wonder/conclude if they should just move into that appendix (and then I'll wordsmith it a bit). - I'd replace the should with an explicit deferral to HTTP + the norm. - I'd hyperlink Automation (to 2.0)
I'm willing to do it, just want to make sure it's not separated for some reason I'm missing. The response to this request SHOULD be 200 to indicate that the action has completed, or 201 or 202 to indicate that the request has been queued and will be dealt with at a later time, or a 4xx or 5xx status code to indicate failure. Note: If returning a 202 HTTP status code, the HTTP specification suggests returning a monitor to track the status of the execution. It is recommended that if OSLC providers use the 202 status code that they consider using the OSLC Automation Specification’s Automation Request or Automation Result resource as such a monitor. Best Regards, John Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario
