OK. I could quibble on the particulars, but it would be a case of violent agreement now that I understand the sense in which you used 'template'. Bottom line, I understand the/some reasons for defining ContentAsRDF, it is a RDF "version" of the Atom problem where XML-based members were "handled differently" than others. If I try to omit ContentAsRDF, I cannot craft rules that both work and are consistent with the Open World Assumption that RDF is based on. In order to avoid the "extra" level of indirection I'd have to do weird things like inventing a "http:rdfBody" predicate, which is just doing the same thing in a different (worse, because of the extra coupling it implies) way. "next"
Best Regards, John Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario
