When we update the samples wiki page [1] with samples for 2.1, does anyone have any preference between:
1. Creating a new page for 2.1 with duplicate content (from the 2.0 page) and adding 2.1 samples to the new page. 2. Creating a new page for 2.1-only content, and linking to 2.0 samples page (not duplicating 2.0 samples). 3. Updating the samples page to not contain a version in its name (as we did for the primer) and note in that page which samples use features or terms added in 2.1? I propose option 3. Does anyone care to second this or object to it? [1] http://open-services.net/wiki/automation/OSLC-Automation-Version-2.0-Samples Thanks, Martin Pain Software Developer - Green Hat Rational Test Virtualization Server, Rational Test Control Panel Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration - Automation WG joint chair E-mail: [email protected] Find me on: and within IBM on: IBM United Kingdom Limited Registered in England and Wales with number 741598 Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 3AU Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
