I believe it should be referring to the recognition rule, not "provider restrictions".
In addition, "that resource MUST conform to the requirements placed on those resources by the OSLC Automation specification. " should probably move to "additional provider constraints", instead of being under the recognition rule, as it's not needed for pattern recognition. Martin Pain Software Developer - Green Hat Rational Test Virtualization Server, Rational Test Control Panel Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration - Automation WG joint chair E-mail: [email protected] Find me on: and within IBM on: IBM United Kingdom Limited Registered in England and Wales with number 741598 Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 3AU "Oslc-Automation" <[email protected]> wrote on 18/03/2014 17:01:44: > From: John Arwe <[email protected]> > To: [email protected], > Date: 18/03/2014 17:02 > Subject: [Oslc-Automation] Actions 2.0: additional provider > constraints reference from Automation Request IP to Fixed Body IP > appears to be dangling > Sent by: "Oslc-Automation" <[email protected]> > > [1] says (under its recognition rule): it MUST adhere to the > provider restrictions of the HTTP request with fixed body > interaction pattern, > > Following my nose to the fixed body section [2], I fall off of known > space looking for the restrictions. I know we probably missed a > change from "restrictions" to "constraints", but at this point > *only* [1] has the "addl provider constraints" heading or anything similar. > > Is the statement in [1] simply vacuous at this point, so I should > remove it? Martin, my guess is that you are the mostly likely > expert in this section of the material. AFAIK it's only you and I > that have been mucking with the actions/IP text in this area. > > I don't see anything about http:body in [1], so I'm suspecting that > it should be referring back to the recognition rule for FB instead > of the to its "provider restrictions". I can tilt my head such that > "provider restrictions" comes to mean the http:body linkage, but it > does give me a crick in the neck doing so. I doubt anyone outside > the WG would reasonably read it that way. > > > > > > [1] http://open-services.net/wiki/core/Exposing-arbitrary-actions- > on-RDF-resources/#pattern-autoreq > [2] http://open-services.net/wiki/core/Exposing-arbitrary-actions- > on-RDF-resources/#pattern-body-repn > Best Regards, John > > Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages > Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario > _______________________________________________ > Oslc-Automation mailing list > [email protected] > http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-automation_open-services.net Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
