That warning is still intact.
Martin Pain Software Developer - Green Hat Rational Test Virtualization Server, Rational Test Control Panel Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration - Automation WG joint chair E-mail: [email protected] Find me on: and within IBM on: IBM United Kingdom Limited Registered in England and Wales with number 741598 Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 3AU From: John Arwe <[email protected]> To: [email protected], Date: 16/04/2014 12:46 Subject: Re: [Oslc-Automation] Final changes (hopefully) for Actions spec: desiredResult -> finalStatusLocation Sent by: "Oslc-Automation" <[email protected]> > 4. I allowed multiple values for oslc:finalStatusLocation ([1], [2]), in case the final status is reflected in more than one place (to allow future interaction patterns to aid Just make sure this doesn't open up the door to mixing single and multi-message IPs. I don't remember if there was additional text at this point ... IIRC there's a non-normative "there be dragons" warning, if that survived it's probably sufficient - it's not like we have an iron-clad proof that they cannot ever be mixed (although we're getting close), but we have articulated specific cases where doing so causes conflicts. While I'm here: regrets for this week's meeting, at W3C F2F Best Regards, John Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario _______________________________________________ Oslc-Automation mailing list [email protected] http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-automation_open-services.net Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
