On the wiki and:
* Main agenda items:
- Review [14 August minutes](
http://open-services.net/wiki/automation/AutomationMeetings201407814/)
- Automation 2.1 & Actions
* [Action metadata at resource type/shape level](
http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-automation_open-services.net/2014-July/000781.html
) (Scroll down for initial email). - Scenario submission from Anamitra?
* [Actions 2.0 Review by Ian](
http://open-services.net/wiki/core/File:review_of_actions2.0_draftspec_img.pdf/
)
* Responses by Martin: Part II [Sections 4-6](
http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-automation_open-services.net/2014-August/000815.html
), [Sections 7-9](
http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-automation_open-services.net/2014-August/000816.html
) (Older: [Part I](
http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-automation_open-services.net/2014-July/000806.html
), [Part II (1-3)](
http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-automation_open-services.net/2014-August/000808.html
))
* Ian.II.7.1: Binding titles
* Ian.II.7.3: Red text on requestURI & allowing Resource
value-type
* (Ian.II.7.4: oslc:label & "action dialog")
* Ian.II.7.5: literal values for ParameterInstance rdf:value
property in fixed body pattern
* Ian.II.8.1: Complying with multiple profiles simultaneously.
* Ian.II.8.2: Identifier for profiles
* Ian.II.9.4: Identifier for "standard restrictions"
* Issues Martin proposes we don't address (as it would generate
too much work or wouldn't bring enough benefit): Ian.II.7.2 (WGs MUST talk
to Core), Ian.II.9.1 (uniqueness of property values in Appendix A),
Ian.II.9.2 (Content-Type in Appendix A), Ian.II.9.3 (requestURI literal
allowed? - covered by 7.3). Any objections? Anyone want to +1 any of these
points?
- "Availability"
- Workgroup business
+ Next meeting?
- AOB
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
