Tweaked the wording slightly further, to: Note: At least one interaction pattern must match on a binding for the consumer to be compatible with that binding. It is theoretically possible that multiple interaction patterns may match one binding if interaction patterns that extend those in 2.0 are defined in certain ways, but in the 2.0 specification at most one interaction pattern matches any single binding.
(Replaced "multiple bindings may match" with "multiple interaction patterns may match one binding") John Arwe <[email protected]> wrote on 15/09/2014 17:54:52: > From: John Arwe <[email protected]> > To: Martin P Pain/UK/IBM@IBMGB > Cc: [email protected] > Date: 15/09/2014 17:54 > Subject: Re: [Oslc-Automation] no cherry picking aka Ian.I.5 - > changes are live, please review Carefully > > > Just one note: In Overview -> Domain specific consumers: The 3rd-to- > > last bullet mentions multiple patterns per binding without saying > > that it doesn't happen. (It says "Note: At least one interaction > > pattern must match on a binding for the consumer to be compatible > > with that binding, but it is possible that multiple bindings may > > match.") I think it's probably fine as it is, but did you intend it > > leave it as-is or was it missed? > > I don't remember that spot in particular, so I'll assume "missed". > I tweaked the wording to clarify, at the expense of adding words > (apologies to Mark Twain) > Best Regards, John > > Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages > Cloud and Smarter Infrastructure OSLC Lead Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
