Olivier Berger <[email protected]> wrote on 10/21/2009 11:56:52 AM:
> Has it been discussed using RDF Site Summary, aka RSS 1.0 which is RSS > under the RDF format as a way to transport collections of resources > instead of ATOM ? > > I could only find some mentions of ATOM here : > http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/CmArchitecturalDirection? > sortcol=table;up=#Architectural_Decisions_for_OSLC (and the site > seems down ATM for further searches :-( ) > > RSS 1.0 is RDF, so it would look a little bit more interesting to me (vs > ATOM which is no RDF) in order to allow the transportation of > collections of RDF resources that are in turn composed of properties > relating to from multiple ontologies/schemas (i.e. OSLC-CM V1 + tool or > domain specific extensions). We can queue this up for an upcoming agenda. Looking back, I believe that pagination support and general support in products is what led us to ATOM [1]. There is the possibility of supporting more as we evaluate options. It would be good to get your feedback on another RDF/XML collection discussion [2] in Metrics topic. Thanks, Steve [1] http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/CmRestApiV1#Get_a_collection_of_change_reque [2] http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/MetricsCollectionsInRDFXML
