Hi. Le lundi 29 mars 2010 à 09:56 -0400, Steve K Speicher a écrit : > "Wolf, Timo" <[email protected]> wrote on 03/29/2010 08:11:13 AM: > > > > When saving a link in RTC, RTC tries to store a back link to the > > Provider side, using the property > "oslc_cm:relatedChangeManagement" . > > > > I actually figured out what is going on and implemented the Provider > > part, but I did not find anything about > > oslc_cm:relatedChangeManagement in the OSLC spec. > > Is this missing or can you give me a link to the related spec in V1 > or V2? > > > > Hi Timo, > > This property 'oslc_cm:relatedChangeManagement' is a proprietary > extension added by the RTC 2.0 product (not part of OSLC-CM V1). You > may inquiry on a http://jazz.netforum for details on it. > > We are looking at providing this property in a V2 specification, > looking to complete this work soon: > http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/CmResourceDefinitionsV2
So shouldn't RTC use a custom prefix for such a proprietary extension ? Should there be some versioning also in such prefixes to distinguish between V1, V2, etc ? My 2 cents, Best regards, -- Olivier BERGER <[email protected]> http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8 Ingénieur Recherche - Dept INF Institut TELECOM, SudParis (http://www.it-sudparis.eu/), Evry (France)
