Thanks for the clarification. Cheers, Dave
-- Dave Steinberg Rational Software - IBM Toronto Lab mailto:[email protected] From: Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS To: Dave Steinberg <[email protected]>, [email protected] Date: 05/27/2010 09:57 AM Subject: Re: [oslc-cm] Attachments in CM 2.0? Hi Dave, We went through a de-scoping effort in attempt to meet the goals of the timeframe. The workgroup did during the May 12th meeting http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/CmMeetings05122010 The priorities page needs to be updated (on my todo list). As we are looking to finalize the CM 2.0 spec, we currently don't have a proposal for attachments support. I believe it is on our short list for post-2.0 work. We can even position attachments support in this area http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/CmExperimental and get some more feedback on it. Thanks, Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645 > From: Dave Steinberg <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Date: 05/26/2010 04:44 PM. > Subject: [oslc-cm] Attachments in CM 2.0? > Sent by: [email protected] > > Hi all, > > I was looking through the various docs in the wiki, and I'm > wondering about something I saw here (which was quite recently updated): > http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/CmTechnicalPrioritiesV2 > > Attachments is listed as in-progress, and I was wondering whether > that implies some intent to still try to get it into the 2.0 spec? > Or is the spec at the point where only existing issues are being resolved? > > Thanks, > Dave > > -- > Dave Steinberg > Rational Software - IBM Toronto Lab > mailto:[email protected].
