Thanks Sam, per our discussion today we agreed to make that change. Thanks, Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645
> From: Samuel Padgett/Durham/IBM@IBMUS > To: [email protected] > Date: 07/28/2010 10:24 AM > Subject: [oslc-cm] Specification Versioning > Sent by: [email protected] > > > The OSLC Core spec says providers MUST respond with the OSLC-Core- > Version header set to 2.0 if returning a 2.0 resource representation > [1]. In the CM spec, this is only a SHOULD [2]. I propose we change > the SHOULD to a MUST to align with the Core spec. > > Best Regards, > Sam > > [1] http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/OslcCoreSpecification? > sortcol=table;up=#Supporting_pre_Core_clients > [2] http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/CmSpecificationV2? > sortcol=table;up=#Specification_Versioning > _______________________________________________ > Oslc-Cm mailing list > [email protected] > http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-cm_open-services.net
