Hi Steve, Good stuff. This table is very helpful.
One thing to consider is to vary the colorcoding based on the "level" column. A "N" for a "MUST" level is definitively a red, but a "N" for a "MAY" is more an orange or yellow. With this colorcoding it becomes more obvious where the important gaps are. Thanks, --andre On 23.11.2010, at 22:51, Steve K Speicher wrote: > I am in the process of migrating the CM 2.0 Implementation Reports [1] > into a unified table [2]. > This format seems much more appealing to me. I have defined a set of > rules to auto-color the cells so we can better see the gaps: Y vs N vs P > (partial) support. I have also included a few more rows that I think > would be useful to capture (they are now blank). > > Please verify what I have done. I believe some of the reports are even a > little dated at the moment. > > Feedback most welcome. > > Also, please send me your email to use to register you as an editor to > this document. > > [1] - http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/CmImplementationReports > [2] - > https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AsgaoPBj7epTdEw1MW41OEJmRlozQlpMM1Rxel9KRUE&hl=en&authkey=CKfzkPAB > > Thanks, > Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645 > > > _______________________________________________ > Oslc-Cm mailing list > [email protected] > http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-cm_open-services.net
