Steve K Speicher <[email protected]> writes: > Olivier Berger <[email protected]> wrote on 09/10/2012 > >> Have you evaluated the mapping of current common bug trackers >> configurations WRT the proposed severities or priorities ? >> >> I'm afraid these may not always map the existing defaults in bugzilla, >> jira, mantis, etc. (which could be tweaked at instances by >> administrators, most of the time). >> >> I'm not sure how that would fit, but there can always be subclassing of >> the cm:Priority and cm:Severity for local variants... and it would be >> good the specs/docs illustrate how to do that for say, your local >> FusionForge trackers ;) >> > > Not in much detail for some time but agree we should flush this out. > Picking JIRA, RTC, Bugzilla and Mantis seem like a good set...volunteers? > >> Btw, Wishlist/"Feature request" is sometimes a particular severity, >> IIRC, so implementers would have to pay attention to that particular >> case of course. > > Right, do you have any samples of this? I could dig around I suppose. >
Hmm... I happen to use FusionForge trackers from time to time, and it seems we have severities : 'blocker', 'critical', 'major', 'normal', 'minor', 'trivial' or 'enhancement' for instance... but we also have feature request trackers... so... I don't know. In any case, this can be customized on a per tracker most probably. Hth. Best regards, -- Olivier BERGER http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8 Ingenieur Recherche - Dept INF Institut Mines-Telecom, Telecom SudParis, Evry (France)
