HI Everyone I will be participating in ALM Forum (in April) and Innovate (June). Maybe it will great that we can meet F2F and try to make a communication plan for our activities L
From: Oslc-Communications [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sean Kennedy Sent: den 20 mars 2014 20:48 To: Vasaiely, Parham Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Oslc-communications] open-services.net (and OSLC logo?) publicredesign Hi Parham, While there has been quite a bit of success towards the mission of the OSLC Communications group, I don't know that we can ever say "mission accomplished". Still, I certainly see that a lot of the recent work, say ALM Forum, has taken place without formal interaction in this group, but more through OASIS and the OSLC Steering Committee. Before we take the step of shutting the group, why don't we take the chance to discuss how the group could operate more effectively, and how it should relate to, and support, the StC. What do others think? Best regards, ________________________________ Sean Kennedy [IBM] OSLC Community Development Leader for IBM Rational Operations Coordinator for the OSLC Steering Committee Phone: +1-905-413-4385 8200 Warden Ave Fax: +1-905-413-4850 Markham, Ontario L6G 1C7 Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> D1/R0A/8200/MKM LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/seanpk Canada ________________________________ [cid:[email protected]] OSLC: Lifecycle integration inspired by the web http://open-services.net Eclipse Lyo: Enabling tool integration with OSLC http://eclipse.org/lyo There is nothing more powerful than an idea whose time has come. -- Victor Hugo From: "Vasaiely, Parham" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> To: Sean Kennedy/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA, <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Date: 2014/03/20 01:23 PM Subject: RE: [Oslc-communications] open-services.net (and OSLC logo?) publicredesign ________________________________ Personally I believe that our OSLC User Group for Communications has achieve its initially set objectives. Under the new structure, I don't see it to actively contribute in terms of making any decisions related to official dissemination and exploitation activities of the OSLC. I agree though that we can keep the communication line open for non OASIS member to bring in ideas and feedback into the group. Therefore, if all partners of this working group agree I'd suggest to close the WG in its traditional structure - since we have reached all our objectives I'd suggest a thanks message to everybody in the community. Best Regards, Parham Vasaiely Systems Engineering Project Manager --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Airbus Group TX5AE Systems Engineering Processes & Platforms www.airbus-group.com<http://www.airbus-group.com/>
