Steve Speicher wrote: >> In CM we were able to accomplish most needed use cases for "or" by introducing "in".
I suspect you're after something like "priority = high OR priority = critical" and that can be replaced by "in". But not all OR's can be so replaced, even for relatively simple stuff. The classic example is with "priority" of a change request. As a manager, I may want to see something about all the high priority changes requests. But there are likely two priority attributes, a "customer priority" and a "development priority"; so I need to say something like (forgive my syntax): "customer priority in (I'm going to your vice president, critical, high) OR development priority in (blocker, high, really fun to code) Now whether this still needs to be implemented as part of the "simple query syntax" is of course still a question, since it was never claimed that the simple query syntax covers all cases. Andy Berner Lead Architect, ISV Technical Enablement and Strategy IBM Rational Business Development 972 561-6599 [email protected] Ready for IBM Rational software partner program - http://www.ibm.com/isv/rational/readyfor.html
