Dave <[email protected]> wrote on 03/19/2010 01:26:53 PM: > I do have a couple more questions for the WG: > > - Should we offer any guidance to folks who wish to store HTML5 or > HTML 4.0.1 content as a property value?
Perhaps, if the statement is to just use XML Literal constructs CDATA, may be enough. Or a simple encoding type, base-64 I believe was suggested could work too. > - Instead of an "XML Literal" value-type, what if we allowed only > "XHTML Literal"? -- thus allowing literal XML only for rich text. I think just a simple "XML Literal" type would be enough. Thanks, Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645
