Dave, did we conclude yesterday that "integer" should be included in the list of literal value-types in defining oslc properties? and in the resource shape section as well?
Should I log an issue for this? Thanks....Scott Scott Bosworth | IBM Rational CTO Team | [email protected] | 919.486.2197 (w) | 919.244.3387(m) | 919.254.5271(f)
