Arthur, I like that a lot. Does anybody object to this change in terminology?
- Dave On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Arthur Ryman <[email protected]> wrote: > I propose that we use the following resource type naming scheme that uses > a more orthogonal approach. > > "inline" means that the value of the resource is given by a node element > (i.e. the resource is given inline). > > "local" means that the resource is a blank node, which may have a local > identifier. > > Each of these adjectives may modify the term "resource". The combinations > are as follows: > > "resource" - the property element. has an rdf:resource attribute that > gives the URI of the resource. > > "local resource" - the property element has an rdf:nodeID attribute that > gives the local blank node ID of the resource (the ID is local to the > RDF/XML document) > > "inline resource" - the property element contains a node element that > contains the resource's properties, and the node element has an rdf:about > attribute that gives the URI of the resource. > > "local inline resource" - the property element contains a node element > that contains the resource's properties, and the node element does NOT > have an rdf:about attribute. It MAY have an rdf:nodeID attribute that > gives the local ID of the resource.
