Tack,

In your sample writeup you suggest adding a property to the Query 
Capability. 
<oslc:isResourceNodeQuery>true</oslc:isResourceNodeQuery>

I recently added this to the spec, but it's named oslc:isMultiSubject. 
"true" means more than one subject (result if rdf:RDF), "false" means a 
single subject node (result is rdf:Description).

Regards, 
___________________________________________________________________________ 

Arthur Ryman, PhD, DE


Chief Architect, Project and Portfolio Management

IBM Software, Rational

Markham, ON, Canada | Office: 905-413-3077, Cell: 416-939-5063
Twitter | Facebook | YouTube







From:
Tack Tong/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
To:
[email protected]
Date:
04/15/2010 11:34 AM
Subject:
[oslc-core] Example Use Case for the Core
Sent by:
[email protected]



I built an example for the Core using one of the Reporting Use Case. 
to illustrate how the Core can be used in an end to end scenario (Service 
Provider Resource....Query Capability.....Resource Shape 
Resource.......Query Syntax.....Query Resource.....RDF/XML representation) 

to validate my understanding of the Core (please give me feedback if I 
misuse and let me know what is the right way) 
through this experience, to identify any issues or questions (I 
highlighted those in red in the doc. Dave, I would appreciate responses on 
those and whether I need to raise formal issues in the Issue page.) 
use this example to help the Reporting WG to understand the Core 
use this example as the base for the Reporting Spec. Implementation 
Validation work

Dave, you asked for examples for the Core. You are welcome to take any 
snippets from this example, edit and include in the Core, if you feel 
appropriate.

(See attached file: oslc implementation 100412.doc)


Tack Tong
IBM Rational software
[email protected]
905-413-3232
tie line 313-3232_______________________________________________
Oslc-Core mailing list
[email protected]
http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net


<<attachment: oslc_implementation_100412.doc>>

Reply via email to