> Are Comments something that is Core or something > that is common? Yes :) I believe common themes/patterns from domains are identified, they can be addressed in some core way.
Thanks, Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645 Dave <[email protected]> wrote on 04/27/2010 01:33:19 PM: > From: Dave <[email protected]> > To: Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS > Cc: oslc-core <[email protected]>, [email protected] > Date: 04/27/2010 01:33 PM > Subject: Re: [oslc-cm] Proposed Discussion/Comment resource model > for inclusion into Core > > No objection here. > > ... Although it does make me wonder if we need to clean up the > Core/Common areas of the wiki and perhaps draw some distinction > between common and core (or drop the term "common" if it has become > redundant w/Core). Are Comments something that is Core or something > that is common? > > - Dave > > > On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Steve K Speicher > <[email protected]> wrote: > > The CM workgroup has defined a resource model for Discussions and Comments > > see: http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/CmComments > > > > This appears to be very applicable to many domains. I'd propose we move > > this to Core spec/guidance and it live in the core namespace. Any > > objections? > > > > Thanks, > > Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Oslc-Cm mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-cm_open-services.net > > > >
