I should mention that (I claim) the summary includes the issues that Arthur raised this week in his detailed review of the Core. Many have already been resolved in the Core spec and thus do not appear on this list.
- Dave On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Dave <[email protected]> wrote: > This is what we'll cover tomorrow in the OSLC Core WG meeting (numbers > are from the issues page). > > Possibly resolved issues > * Common Properties #15 - Consensus seems to be to use dcterms > * OSLC Defined Resources # 26 - Value-types, node ID issue, RDF > terminology, requiring RDF parser, etc. > * Query Capability #24 - need a query resource definition? Consensus is > mixed. > > Contentious new issues ;-) > * Common Properties #17 - drop oslc:instanceShape > * Resource Shapes #25 - drop oslc:describes > * OSLC Defined Resources # 28 - drop notion of extended properties > > New issues > * Creation Resources #5 - programmatic id of create, query > * Resource Shapes #25 - how to offer / extend resource shapes? >
