Hi Olivier, Giving a little background I think would help as well in the Core spec. We had discussed calling the Core 1.0 but found it quite confusing when trying to discuss in context with CM 1.0 and 2.0. We came to the realization that it may be more clear if we referred to Core as 2.0, where the 1.0 "Core" was really embedded in a number of 1.0 specs (CM, QM, RM).
Thanks, Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645 > From: Olivier Berger <[email protected]> > To: oslc-core <[email protected]> > Date: 06/23/2010 07:13 AM > Subject: [oslc-core] Core V1 or Core V2 ? > Sent by: [email protected] > > Hi. > > Just a quick note to mention I'm puzzled at reading the OslcCore > "sub-wiki" to see mentions of OslcCore V2 at places when there doesn't > seem to be OslcCore V1 specs anywhere... > > This may be obvious to the work group having followed all previous > episodes, but looks strange I guess for potential newcomers. > > Maybe some versioning disclaimer may be added at the top of > http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/OSLCCoreSpecDRAFT ? > > Just my 2 cents. > > Best regards, > -- > Olivier BERGER <[email protected]> > http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8 > Ingénieur Recherche - Dept INF > Institut TELECOM, SudParis (http://www.it-sudparis.eu/), Evry (France) > > > _______________________________________________ > Oslc-Core mailing list > [email protected] > http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net
