We tabled the issue of ordered properties in the Core spec, but this could be a good idea for a separate guidance document.
- Dave On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:10 PM, James Conallen <[email protected]> wrote: > In the section "Order of property values insignificant" it states that > "providers MUST not place any significance on the ordering of property > values in representations." > > Would it be appropriate to append to this some guidance on how ordering > should be achieved (i.e. rdf:Seq)? > > Otherwise we might end up with many different ways to imply ordering. > > <jim/> > > jim conallen > [email protected] > Rational Software, IBM Software Group > > > _______________________________________________ > Oslc-Core mailing list > [email protected] > http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net > >
