Patrick Streule <[email protected]> wrote on 08/02/2010 03:43:57 
PM:

> From: Patrick Streule <[email protected]>
> To: Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: [email protected]
> Date: 08/02/2010 03:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [oslc-core] Proposed change to JSON formatting rules 
> for Query responses
> 
> I am in favor of Steve's suggestion, too, but this would mean that the 
same
> change is necessary elsewhere:
> 
> Looking at the example in
> http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/OSLCCoreSpecAppendixB?
> sortcol=table;up=#Query_Resource
> 
> There is a resource oslc:BlogQuery with oslc_blog:comment properties 
that
> hold the query results.
> 
> These elements are defined by the Query Resource Shape.

I would expect with our approach to resource formats now, we could simply 
represent the query response as:

<rdf:RDF 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#";
   xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/";
   xmlns:oslc="http://open-services.net/ns/core#"; 
   xmlns:oslc_blog="http://open-services.net/ns/bogus/blogs#";>

   <oslc:ResponseInfo rdf:about="http://example.com/query?oslc.from [...] 
entry/1&gt;">
      <dcterms:title>Blog Service Query Results for term 
[remote]</dcterms:title>
   </oslc:ResponseInfo>

   <oslc_blog:Comment rdf:about="http://example.com/blogs/comment/5";>
     <!-- Comment propery values, etc. -->
     <dcterms:title>Comment #5</dcterms:title>
   </oslc_blog:Comment>
   <oslc_blog:Comment rdf:about="http://example.com/blogs/comment/4";>
     <!-- Comment propery values, etc. -->
     <dcterms:title>Comment #4</dcterms:title>
   </oslc_blog:Comment>
   <oslc_blog:Comment rdf:about="http://example.com/blogs/comment/2";>
      <!-- Comment propery values, etc. -->
      <dcterms:title>Comment #2</dcterms:title>
   </oslc_blog:Comment>
   <oslc_blog:Comment rdf:about="http://example.com/blogs/comment/1";>
      <!-- Comment propery values, etc. -->
      <dcterms:title>Comment #1</dcterms:title>
   </oslc_blog:Comment>
   <oslc_blog:Comment rdf:about="http://example.com/blogs/comment/3";>
      <!-- Comment propery values, etc. -->
      <dcterms:title>Comment #3</dcterms:title>
   </oslc_blog:Comment>

</rdf:RDF>

Thus eliminating the intermediate query resource and property, just 
include the resources in the response.

> 
> Some concerns that I have:
> 
> 1) Wouldn't these resources/properties also have to be spec'd by the
> domains? I.e. the CM spec would have to define e.g. a
> 'oslc_cm:ChangeRequestQueryResult' resource. Currently, I don't see
> anything about query results e.g. in the CM, QM and RM specs.

I have an outstanding action to add definition of this for "oslc:results" 
for JSON query results.
I made an assumption about the RDF/XML and XML form (as illustrated above) 
that I need to get clarification on, where I thought we didn't need to 
define query resources for the response.

> 2) Does a domain specific query result resource provide added value over 
a
> generic 'oslc:QueryResult' resource with 'oslc:results' properties? I 
see
> that we get "Type Safety" by the domain specific resources/properties, 
but
> the convenience of a common format for query results seems to outweigh
> that, IMO.
> 
> Thanks,
> Patrick
> 
> 
> 
>  
>   From:       Steve K Speicher <[email protected]>  
>  
>   To:         [email protected]  
>  
>   Date:       07/27/2010 10:57 PM  
>  
>   Subject:    [oslc-core] Proposed change to JSON formatting rules 
> for Query    responses  
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Current JSON guidance [1] doesn't address what the result array name
> should be.
> 
> I recommend that we use "oslc:results" array, like for delegated UIs [2]
> 
> See also example at [3], how does a consumer know to look for array 
named
> "oslc_blog:comment" in this example.  I think it would be best to use a
> general OSLC property.
> So this example would become:
>  "oslc:results" : [{
>        "oslc:qname" : "oslc_blog:BlogComment",
>        "rdf:resource" : "http://example.com/blogs/comment/346";,
>     },
> 
> [1]
> http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/
> OSLCCoreRepresentationsGuidance#Guidelines_for_JSON
> 
> [2]
> http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/
> OslcCoreSpecification#Delegated_User_Interface_Dialogs
> 
> [3]
> 
http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/OSLCCoreSpecAppendixD#Query_Resource

> 
> Thanks,
> Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________



Reply via email to