That was my understanding too. That said, it should be translable - I18N, right?
I'm sure what exactly we should get from oslc:propertyDefinition URI? Is there any sample for this? Thanks, -- Sofia ----- Original Message ----- From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 7:57:38 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: Re: [oslc-core] ResourceShape usage of oslc:name in conjunction with oslc:propertyDefinition > Regarding oslc:name What is this required or needed at all? Can this be > determined from the oslc:propertyDefinition URI ? The oslc:name doesn't > have any namespace URI. The usage of it seems redundant and error prone. > Though do we make any guarantees on how to split the > oslc:propertyDefinition URI after hash # to determine the name or is there > even a need? > > See > http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/ > OSLCCoreSpecAppendixA#oslc_ResourceShape_Resource I thought oslc:name was there for the purposes of having a human readable label that could be presented to end users in something like a query builder or other ui? This seems like a different purpose than oslc:propertyDefinition? Scott Bosworth | IBM Rational CTO Team | [email protected] | 919.486.2197(w) | 919.244.3387(m) | 919.254.5271(f)
