Yes, this makes sense. If we mean URN, then value type should be Resource and not String.
Steve: do we really want this to be a URN? If so, do you think the change is worth risking / inconveniencing ongoing implementations? Thanks, - Dave On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Ian Green1 <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://open-services.net/ns/core#Publisher > > requires a String valued dcterms:identifier. Description states that this > is a URN. If it is to be a URN, then the value-type should be Resource > with an unspecified Range, I would argue. Changing the description is > another option. > > > best wishes, > -ian > > [email protected] (Ian Green1/UK/IBM@IBMGB) > Chief Software Architect, Requirements Definition and Management > IBM Rational > > > _______________________________________________ > Oslc-Core mailing list > [email protected] > http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net >
