my 2c, I worry about guidance that that suggests that it is ok to essentially cache information about a resource that is being referenced (and managed by) on another server. If this is to be a practice, what are the recommendations for ensuring that this information remains in sync. Looking at the referenced example, what happens if the owner of the resource 123 changes its title to "Enhancement 123: Enable multi-root installs"? Will this have to be manually updated? If not, does the system automatically update properties of links whenever it detects them.
While I do recognize this may be a way to save a GET call. I don't think it represents a best practice. <jim/> jim conallen CAM Lead Architect [email protected] Rational Software, IBM Software Group From: Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Date: 08/31/2010 02:47 PM Subject: [oslc-core] Provided guidance for adding relationship labels Sent by: [email protected] I wanted to call out some specification updates that was created for handling of relationship labels on URI relationship properties. Note the support for this is optional but wanted to make sure this was done in a uniform way across implementations. Let me know if there are any issues with this. http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/CmSpecificationV2#Labels_for_Relationships Thanks, Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645 _______________________________________________ Oslc-Core mailing list [email protected] http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net
