Hello Olivier,
In the cases you mention, not offering a name is more informative than
providing canned text. Clients can interpret "UNSAID" as they see fit.
The foaf vocabulary does not require "name", or "lastName" etc, so OSLC
should consider why it wants its providers make this promise.
best wishes,
-ian
[email protected] (Ian Green1/UK/IBM@IBMGB)
Chief Software Architect, Requirements Definition and Management
IBM Rational
[email protected] wrote on 04/09/2010 18:39:49:
> [image removed]
>
> Re: [oslc-core] Question on use of foaf:Person
>
> Olivier Berger
>
> to:
>
> oslc-core
>
> 04/09/2010 18:40
>
> Sent by:
>
> [email protected]
>
> Hi.
>
> Le samedi 04 septembre 2010 à 12:26 -0400, Samuel Padgett a écrit :
> > Hi, Scott. Appendix A says this,
> >
> > >> "There is an additional constraint for foaf:Person. Implementations
> > MUST specify either a non-empty foaf:name value or both a non-empty
> > foaf:givenName and foaf:familyName values." [1]
> >
> > A lot of providers don't require a real name when creating user IDs.
> > ClearQuest is one example. I'm not sure how to handle this case as
it's a
> > MUST per the spec.
> >
> > Also I share Ian's concern that this is potentially sensitive
information.
> >
>
> I'm not sure such requirements are problematic, since the name might as
> well just be set to "unknown" or "(not provided)" or "(masked)" or
> whatever ...
>
> I think it's great for potential interoperability with LOD [0] to use
> widely used ontologies like FOAF to describe persons, but no one says
> that its properties may be authoritative in any way, right ?
>
> Just my 2 cents,
>
> [0] http://linkeddata.org/
> --
> Olivier BERGER <[email protected]>
> http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8
> Ingénieur Recherche - Dept INF
> Institut TELECOM, SudParis (http://www.it-sudparis.eu/), Evry (France)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Oslc-Core mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
