+1 for your proposed change to: "An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context."
Thanks, - Dave On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Arthur Ryman <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > That is how the EMS 1.0 spec uses dcterms:identifier. Resources already > have URIs, so they don't need another URN. They do need a short identifier > they identifies them within a limited context. > > Regards, > ___________________________________________________________________________ > > Arthur Ryman, PhD, DE > > > Chief Architect, Project and Portfolio Management > > IBM Software, Rational > > Markham, ON, Canada | Office: 905-413-3077, Cell: 416-939-5063 > Twitter | Facebook | YouTube > > > > > > > > From: > Steve K Speicher <[email protected]> > To: > [email protected] > Date: > 09/03/2010 10:05 AM > Subject: > [oslc-core] Update to oslc:Publisher and its description for > dcterms:identifier > Sent by: > [email protected] > > > > As previously discussed at [1], I recommend that we change the language of > > [2] to be: > "An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context." > > (which is word for word what DC has). > from: > "A URN that uniquely identifies the implementation " > > Any issues with me making this change? > > [1] > http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/2010-August/000510.html > > [2] > http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/OslcCoreSpecification?sortcol=table;up=#Service_Provider_Resources > > (see Publisher) > > Thanks, > Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645 > > > _______________________________________________ > Oslc-Core mailing list > [email protected] > http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Oslc-Core mailing list > [email protected] > http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net >
