Scott, The site is back up and RESTClient did get my ems.rdf. Maybe curl and Poster weren't handling the redirect correctly.
Regards, ___________________________________________________________________________ Arthur Ryman, PhD, DE Chief Architect, Project and Portfolio Management IBM Software, Rational Markham, ON, Canada | Office: 905-413-3077, Cell: 416-939-5063 From: Scott Bosworth <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: 09/24/2010 04:16 PM Subject: Re: [oslc-core] Namespace uri's Sent by: [email protected] Hi Arthur, I tested with the RestClient plug-in for Firefox and it's working fine for me. Of course, there are just a couple of rdf documents published so far (ems and cm namespaces only). The cm one is a placeholder for my testing purposes (it is the sample ChangeRequest shape response). It would be good to socialize what you've published for the ems rdf representation to see if we can get comment and consensus on the proper content and format for an OSLC vocabulary document....Scott Scott Bosworth | IBM Rational CTO Team | [email protected] | 919.486.2197(w) | 919.244.3387(m) | 919.254.5271(f) [email protected] wrote on 09/24/2010 03:32:15 PM: > From: Arthur Ryman <[email protected]> > To: Scott Bosworth <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected], [email protected] > Date: 09/24/2010 03:32 PM > Subject: Re: [oslc-core] Namespace uri's > Sent by: [email protected] > > Scott, > > Thx for setting up the redirection. I verified the HTML. I couldn't get > RDF/XML (tried curl and Poster). Have you tested RDF/XML? > > Regards, > ___________________________________________________________________________ > > Arthur Ryman, PhD, DE > > Chief Architect, Project and Portfolio Management > IBM Software, Rational > Markham, ON, Canada | Office: 905-413-3077, Cell: 416-939-5063 > > > > > > From: > Scott Bosworth <[email protected]> > To: > [email protected] > Date: > 09/22/2010 10:38 PM > Subject: > [oslc-core] Namespace uri's > Sent by: > [email protected] > > > > Per the decisions made in today's Core workgroup call, I've configured > things on open-services.net so that references to OSLC namespace uri's > will be handled according to the W3C Best Practices for publishing RDF > Vocabularies [1]. > > I followed recipe 3 for hash namespaces: handling both html and rdf+xml > requests. Html requests for an OSLC namespace uri (e.g. > open-services.net/ns/core) will result in a redirect to the appropriate > specification wiki page. Additionally, rdf+xml requests are also > configured, though no rdf documents have been published at this point. The > default response is html. > > Things should work for namespace uris that have adopted the > http://open-services.net/ns/* convention, specifically the core, am, cm, > qm, rm, and scm namespace uri's. You can test them out by typing an oslc > namespace uri in your browser. You should be redirected to the appropriate > spec page. > > Thanks...Scott > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-vocab-pub/ > _______________________________________________ > Oslc-Core mailing list > [email protected] > http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Oslc-Core mailing list > [email protected] > http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net _______________________________________________ Oslc-Core mailing list [email protected] http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net
