That's a good write-up, but it is a bit long and won't really fit into the table very well. Maybe we should have a short description for the table and a longer one below, as a footnote, maybe?
- Dave On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Steve K Speicher <[email protected]> wrote: > There was an outstanding action to provide some clarifying text for the > intended usage of the oslc:instanceShape common property [1] > > Here's my proposed update: > > oslc:instanceShape: the URI of a Resource Shape that describes the > possible properties, occurrence, value types, allowed values and labels. > This shape information is useful in displaying the subject resource as > well as guiding clients in performing modifications. The subject > resource's allowed set of properties MAY NOT be limited to the defined set > within this associated shape. Instance shapes MAY be specific to the > authenticated user associated with the request that retrieved the > resource, the current state of the resource and other factors. Consumers > MUST assume that the shape information is valid only in the limited > context of the specific request for which was retrieved and is not > applicable in other contexts or as a general purpose shape of the > resource. Instance shapes SHOULD NOT be cached. > > Note: I will not be able to attend the Core WG call tomorrow. So if Dave > or someone could present this and incorporate it if accepted, it would be > appreciated. > > [1] > http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/OSLCCoreSpecAppendixA#OSLC_Properties > > Thanks, > Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645 > > > _______________________________________________ > Oslc-Core mailing list > [email protected] > http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net >
