I didn't respond to Steve's suggestion of multiple documents: New to OSLC Architecture Implementers OSLC Domains OSLC Community
I think Arthur's point was that the primer should be to-the-point with concrete examples, so of your suggestions, I think only the Implementors doc would be called the OSLC Primer. A architecture document could be useful, but I think we need more overview and introductory material first. And, so I'd like to combine the New to OSLC, Architecture, Domains and Community topics into one overview. That's why I like the two document approach: OSLC Primer and OSLC (Technical?) Overview. - Dave On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Dave <[email protected]> wrote: > Arthur, Thanks for being very specific. > > Seems that we need two documents: > - OSLC Overview > - OSLC Primer > > As you can see from my proposed outline, I think both are high > priority concerns and deserve to be completed at one time as one > document or a pair of documents. > > What do others think about priority? Should we focus exclusively on a > Primer first, or push both ideas forward now? > > - Dave
