Hi. Le vendredi 21 janvier 2011 à 15:03 -0500, Steve K Speicher a écrit : > Per issues #22 & 23 [1] and discussion at CM [2] and Core [3] working > groups, it was decided to rename of the Core resource definition of > oslc:Comment whose property of oslc:discussion to be oslc:partOfDiscussion > [4] > Also a OSLC common property oslc:discussedBy was added to [4] > > [1] http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/OslcCoreV1Issues > [2] http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/CmMeetings20110119 > [3] http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/OslcCoreMeetings20110119 > [4] http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/OSLCCoreSpecAppendixA >
Am I right in understanding that this is a change in already validated specs ? Am I the only one who thinks that maybe the process could be improved if such changes were to be decided online and asynchronously instead of in conf-call meetings ? I think if OSLC seeks to become an open standard managed by a community, then asynchronous + written communication should be preferred to synchronous + oral. There are probably good online howtos re running an online community / decision process, but maybe I'm the only one not feeling comfortable. Regarding the name change, it's not such a big deal. Best regards, -- Olivier BERGER <[email protected]> http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8 Ingénieur Recherche - Dept INF Institut TELECOM, SudParis (http://www.it-sudparis.eu/), Evry (France)
