I had not realized that rdf:nil is of type List. I think it's better to keep changeLog consistent with the rest of OSLC paging and open a work-item to suggest that OSLC should revisit the way it indicates the end of the page sequence.
Best regards, Martin Martin Nally, IBM Fellow CTO and VP, IBM Rational tel: +1 (714)472-2690 Frank Budinsky/Toronto/IBM wrote on 03/21/2011 02:12:17 PM: > [image removed] > > Re: Updated ChangeLog Proposal > > Frank Budinsky > > to: > > Martin Nally > > 03/21/2011 02:12 PM > > Cc: > > oslc-core > > > IMO, It is important to put "oslc:nextPage rdf:nil" to end the ... > I think we'd need to add something like oslc:nilPage for this > purpose because rdf:nil is defined to be an instance of rdf:List, > which pages are not. > > Should we open this as a separate issue? Do we need to keep the > ChangeLog compliant with the current OSLC paging model (i.e., have > no nextPage property on the last page) or can we link these issues? > > Frank. > > Martin Nally/Raleigh/IBM wrote on 03/18/2011 01:45:46 PM: >
