+1 on log namespace. I know we're in the habit of using underscore instead of dash, but I don't like it much - can someone explain where that came from?
I don't understand the objection to oslc-log:Creation - maybe Steve can explain to me more before I vote. Best regards, Martin Martin Nally, IBM Fellow CTO and VP, IBM Rational tel: +1 (714)472-2690 |------------> | From: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |Arthur Ryman <[email protected]> | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | To: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Cc: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |Martin Nally/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, [email protected], [email protected] | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Date: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |03/22/2011 05:38 PM | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Subject: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |Re: [oslc-core] Naming Conventions within ChangeLog proposal | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| Steve, +1 for the log namespace. -1 for CreateEvent - there should be a standard meaning for resource creation. Regards, ___________________________________________________________________________ Arthur Ryman, PhD, DE Chief Architect, Project and Portfolio Management IBM Software, Rational Markham, ON, Canada | Office: 905-413-3077, Cell: 416-939-5063 From: Steve K Speicher <[email protected]> To: Martin Nally <[email protected]>, [email protected] Date: 03/22/2011 05:14 PM Subject: Re: [oslc-core] Naming Conventions within ChangeLog proposal Sent by: [email protected] Might I suggest a couple alternatives to these as well: > oslc:create -> oslc:Creation This seems too general, is this what we want all of OSLC Core to mean by Creation? -> oslc:CreateEvent Include more descriptive noun, since in general core namespace -> oslc_log:Creation Same as proposed but included within some change log namespace > oslc:update -> oslc:Modification > oslc:delete -> oslc:Deletion Same as above Thanks, Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645 > From: Martin Nally/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected], [email protected] > Date: 03/22/2011 10:20 AM > Subject: Re: [oslc-core] Naming Conventions > Sent by: [email protected] > > While we're at it we could maybe improve the grammar. It would feel better > to me if the terms chosen looked more like nouns than verbs - saying > something is "a oslc:Create" is awkward. How about the following > > oslc:create -> oslc:Creation > oslc:update -> oslc:Modification > oslc:delete -> oslc:Deletion > > It would be nice to e able to say "an" instead of just "a", but we can't do > that without W3C. > > Best regards, Martin > > Martin Nally, IBM Fellow > CTO and VP, IBM Rational > tel: +1 (714)472-2690 > > > > > Message: 1 > > Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 15:25:58 -0400 > > From: Arthur Ryman <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [oslc-core] ChangeLog Vocabulary and Naming Conventions > > Message-ID: > > <ofc44196c7.0847d24d-on8525785a.00699988-8525785a.006ac...@ca.ibm.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > > > > This is a very tiny point. > > > > The naming convention for vocabulary terms is that classes and > individuals > > begin with upper case, and properties begin with lower case. If we want > to > > align with that, then we should uppercase terms as follows: > > > > oslc:Create > > oslc:Update > > oslc:Delete > > > > Regards, > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > > > > > Arthur Ryman, PhD, DE > > > > Chief Architect, Project and Portfolio Management > > IBM Software, Rational > > Markham, ON, Canada | Office: 905-413-3077, Cell: 416-939-5063 > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Oslc-Core mailing list > [email protected] > http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net _______________________________________________ Oslc-Core mailing list [email protected] http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net
