Hi Frank et al.,

Apologies for not being able to make it to the meeting today, and if this
input is too late to be useful, I certainly understand that.

I think there's still an existing issue with the latest pagination
proposal. It looks to me like a list of lists or, rather,
something-like-a-list (using custom vocabulary) of lists (using standard
vocabulary). And I think that's more effort for a client to understand and
deal with than a single, basic list would have been.

If the key concern is the use of resources with URIs (as opposed to blank
nodes) within each "page" resource, you could still use a single list with
mostly blank nodes, but retrievable resources for the first entry on each
page.

Cheers,
Dave

--
Dave Steinberg
IBM Rational Software
[email protected]



                                                                       
  From:       Frank Budinsky/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA                         
                                                                       
  To:         [email protected]                              
                                                                       
  Date:       03/29/2011 03:14 PM                                      
                                                                       
  Subject:    Re: [oslc-core] ChangeLog Proposal Finalization          
                                                                       
  Sent by:    [email protected]                      
                                                                       





I also added a short summary of the three remaining issues on the
IndexingProposals WIKI page:

http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/IndexingProposals

Frank.

[email protected] wrote on 03/29/2011 12:26:13 PM:

> [image removed]
>
> [oslc-core] ChangeLog Proposal Finalization
>
> Frank Budinsky
>
> to:
>
> oslc-core
>
> 03/29/2011 12:29 PM
>
> Sent by:
>
> [email protected]
>
> Hi all,
>
> We're very close to finalizing the OSLC ChangeLog proposal. The last
> three issues, which are still being discussed are:
>
> 1. Indexing/ChangeLog resources/scope
> Latest email: http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-
> services.net/2011-March/000898.html
>
> 2. ChangeLog Pagination (also URI-addressable ChangeLog entries)
> Latest email: http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-
> services.net/2011-March/000893.html
>
> 3. Better name for OSLC indexing profile
> Latest email: http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-
> services.net/2011-March/000896.html
>
> We're planning/hoping to finish the discussion of the ChangeLog
> proposal at tomorrow's OSLC WG meeting, so please send any
> additional comments or ideas that you have by replying to this or
> one of the discussion thread emails.
>
> Thanks to everyone that has provided input so far.
>
> Frank._______________________________________________
> Oslc-Core mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net
_______________________________________________
Oslc-Core mailing list
[email protected]
http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net

Reply via email to