+1 for Resource Tracking (since it is a client perspective) One more client perspective suggestion: "Resource Probing"
This may already be the plan: I would suggest keeping specs for Change Log and the Security separate. It is conceivable that domain specs may adopt / require one and not the other. ____________________________________________ Samit Mehta IBM Rational Software - Business Development [email protected] wrote on 04/01/2011 11:07:15 AM: > From: Martin Nally/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected], [email protected] > Date: 04/01/2011 11:08 AM > Subject: Re: [oslc-core] ChangeLog Prifile Naming > Sent by: [email protected] > > How about "Resource Publishing Profile"? "Content Publishing" sounds to me > too much like content management, for which there are many standards > already. "Resource Tracking Profile" sounds weaker to me, but has the > advantage that it's named from the client perspective rather than the > provider perspective, which is usually preferable. > > Best regards, Martin > > Martin Nally, IBM Fellow > CTO and VP, IBM Rational > tel: +1 (714)472-2690 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Oslc-Core mailing list > [email protected] > http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net
