Hi. On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:26:08 -0500, Steve K Speicher <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm proposing to fix the problem with "S" standing for "Services" and > instead introduce "Specifications". So try this on for size, > > Open Specifications for Lifecycle Collaboration (OSLC) > > Open Specifications is really what we want the focus to be out.
+1 I guess it's better also to avoid confusion with Open Services == Open Source implementations : these are Open Specs, but not necessarily implemented in an Open Source way for the compliant products. Just my 2 cents, -- Olivier BERGER http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8 Ingenieur Recherche - Dept INF Institut TELECOM, SudParis (http://www.it-sudparis.eu/), Evry (France)
