oslc:modifiedBy ... fine for us to do it now. Is there any reason not to provide feedback to DCMI that we found it necessary to do so, so that ultimately it may end up in dcterms? It would be hard to believe this is the first time OSLC has identified such a gap, perhaps we have someone experienced with this? dcterms:modified ... should we not fix the obvious typo in the description? At first I thought what you showed was a mangled paste, but no that is the literal text at [1]
[1] http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/OSLCCoreSpecAppendixA?sortcol=table;up=#Dublin_Core_Properties Best Regards, John Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario
