This shows us a couple of important points: 1) The name matters (perhaps we've been too vague in the past). Are there any better suggestions? System Event Management
2) Perhaps a bit more detail would be useful. For example, is there expectations that EM would be expand at some point to handle more generic kind of events Thanks, Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645 > From: John Arwe/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS > To: [email protected], > Date: 05/29/2012 05:50 PM > Subject: Re: [oslc-core] Request for May 30 agenda > Sent by: [email protected] > > No. The idea of this proposal is an event is (roughly) "information about > something that has happened [past tense]". So aside from at least one > timestamp (date of occurrence), no overlap. > > Always funny to see different (but entirely reasonable) interpretations for > similar words based on where one "grew up" or vacationed lately. > Best Regards, John > > Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages > Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario > > > [image removed] Nick Crossley---05/29/2012 03:12:10 PM---John, On the event > management domain - do you see any overlap here with calendars, planning, and sch > > From: Nick Crossley/Irvine/IBM > To: John Arwe/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS > Cc: [email protected] > Date: 05/29/2012 03:12 PM > Subject: Re: [oslc-core] Request for May 30 agenda > > > John, > > On the event management domain - do you see any overlap here with calendars, > planning, and scheduling? > > Nick. > > > [image removed] John Arwe---05/29/2012 11:43:22 AM---I would like to request > Core approval to start up two new working groups to produce domain specific > > From: John Arwe/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS > To: [email protected], > Date: 05/29/2012 11:43 AM > Subject: [oslc-core] Request for May 30 agenda > Sent by: [email protected] > > > > I would like to request Core approval to start up two new working groups to > produce domain specifications in the following areas. In both cases, > parties (currently non-members) have indicated offline that they would be > interested in working on these issues in the context of the OSLC community. > > > [1] Resource Reconciliation WG > > Does a monitoring record about a computer system and an asset record about a > computer system, taken together, describe one or two computer systems? This > is a central issue when the resources described are not themselves > electronic documents, be they computer systems, software applications, HTTP > servers, whatever. > > The goal of this effort would be to define a common set of resources, > properties, and constraints on property values useful for answering that > category of question, so that multiple tools can have a common understanding > of the answer when they integrate. > > > > > [2] Event Management WG > > What events does an event management system contain about a computer system? > Once a human decides that an event occurred "because of" some other event, > or that an event "is about" a particular network device, how can another > product link to details about the event? > > The goal of this effort would be to define a common set of resources, > properties, and RESTful services useful for answering that category of > question, so that multiple tools can have a common answer when they integrate. > [1] http://open-services.net/forums/viewthread/42/ > [2] http://open-services.net/forums/viewthread/41/ > Best Regards, John > > Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages > Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario > _______________________________________________ > Oslc-Core mailing list > [email protected] > http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net > _______________________________________________ > Oslc-Core mailing list > [email protected] > http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net
