John, Yes, the UI preview format is XML not RDF/XML even though it looks like RDF/XML. If the document was RDF/XML then we would tag the markup text as having data type rdf:XMLLiteral. However, since UI preview if just plain XML, then "we" define what its contents mean.
Regards, ___________________________________________________________________________ Arthur Ryman DE, Chief Architect, Reporting & Portfolio Strategy and Management IBM Software, Rational Toronto Lab | +1-905-413-3077 (office) | +1-416-939-5063 (mobile) From: John Arwe <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: Joe Ross <[email protected]> Date: 07/27/2012 08:16 AM Subject: Re: [oslc-core] Proposal for Issue-25: Encoding of UI preview label Sent by: [email protected] Something I need to be clear on: is it the case that this issue applies only to UI preview because UI preview is the only case in OSLC where a resource is defined to be XML and not RDF? Since XMLLiteral is defined by RDF, an XML-based resource definition does not "have access to" its definition (it's outside of XML, and going outside of XML for its definition is not desireable)? Best Regards, John Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario _______________________________________________ Oslc-Core mailing list [email protected] http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net
