Hello Steering Committee:
As was suggested by Rainer [1], let us process the request to approve the OSLC Asset Management V2 specification by email instead of having it as an agenda item for the September meeting. The Core WG is satisfied with this specification [2], an Implementation Report is available [3], and a Test Suite has even been submitted to Eclipse Lyo [4]. As stated in the Bylaws, a super majority vote is required [5]. Therefore 4 "+1" replies on this thread, are needed to approve the OSLC OSLC Asset Management V2 specification. If we do not receive those replies before the September StC meeting, it will need to be discussed at that meeting as there are Implementations of this Specification awaiting this approval. While 4 "+1" replies are required to approve the Specification, please don't hesitate to add your +1 even if you are the fifth or sixth to do so. Thank you. [1]: http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-steeringcommittee_open-services.net/2012-August/000045.html [2]: http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-assetmgmt_open-services.net/2012-April/000029.html [3]: http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/AssetImplementationReports [4]: http://git.eclipse.org/c/lyo/org.eclipse.lyo.testsuite.git/tree/org.eclipse.lyo.testsuite.server/src/main/java/org/eclipse/lyo/testsuite/oslcv2/asset [5]: http://open-services.net/bylaws/#steering-committee "Duties and Responsibilities > SUPER MAJORITY VOTE" Sean Kennedy Phone: 905-413-4385 (Internal: Operations Coordinator for the OSLC Steering 313-4385) Committee Fax: 905-413-4850 (to my Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration attention) OSLC Community Development Leader for IBM Email: [email protected] Rational LinkedIn: seanpk IBM Rational Software - IBM Toronto Software Lab There is nothing more powerful than an idea whose time has come. -- Victor Hugo .
