+1 on this proposal Best wishes, Paul McMahan IBM Rational
"Oslc-Core" <[email protected]> wrote on 05/15/2013 10:45:04 AM: > From: Nick Crossley/Irvine/IBM@IBMUS > To: [email protected] > Date: 05/15/2013 01:10 PM > Subject: [oslc-core] +1 for new property oslc:shortId, OR revised > recommendation on use of rdfs:label > Sent by: "Oslc-Core" <[email protected]> > > We have a need for firmer OSLC guidance on this issue. > > In the RDF index for Rational tool data today, you can perform a > free-text search for a work item number (task number, etc.). This > is because RTC puts the work item number in both the oslc:shortTitle > property and the dcterms:identifier property. Conversely, RQM does > not have any public RDF representation of a test case number - and > as a result a user cannot perform a free-text search for a test case > by number, nor write a query for it. RQM uses the > dcterms:identifier for an internal identifier, not a human readable > one (in fact, it uses the test case URI as its identifier). > > It would be useful to have a firm recommendation on a property to be > used for short human-readable identifiers, whether that is > oslc:shortId, or a revised recommendation on the use of rdfs:label > as per the text quoted by Steve in the earlier email: > > [[ > Yes, rdfs:label is widely used as "just a label". See: > > http://www.aifb.kit.edu/images/c/c0/LabelsInTheWebOfData.pdf > > Usage has evolved from the definition. I agree that the specification > ought to be updated. One for the RDF WG group I think. > ]] > > Nick. > _______________________________________________ > Oslc-Core mailing list > [email protected] > http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net
