It appears that we agreed to add this "a while ago", but the issues [1] list is a bit ambiguous. [1] says "Response Agree with adding April 2012 Mtg - need to propose text, ask DCMI and clarify dcterms:contributor guidance" The April 4 minutes say: Issue-40 comeback on oslc:modifiedBy proposal; No new updates, will proceed as planned
My recollection is that we agreed to add the proposed term *to OSLC Core's vocabulary* in order to proceed, and in parallel handle DCMI for the "right" long term solution. I have a product asking for exactly this semantic, so if the Core vocabulary drafting is the only thing standing in the way of the first part, I'll fix that now. [1] http://open-services.net/wiki/core/OSLC-Core-V2-Issues/ new #8, old #40 Best Regards, John Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario
