John, Are the extension properties candidates for the Shapes spec?
Regards, ___________________________________________________________________________ Arthur Ryman DE, Chief Architect, Reporting & Portfolio and Strategy Management IBM Software, Rational Toronto Lab | +1-905-413-3077 (office) | +1-416-939-5063 (mobile) From: John Arwe <[email protected]> To: [email protected], Date: 11/06/2013 10:19 AM Subject: [oslc-core] today's meeting Sent by: "Oslc-Core" <[email protected]> FYI/regrets-like: I will have to swap over to an executive call for about 10 minutes, probably nearer the start but time is not exact (someone will be poking me on chat when it's time). agenda += (wrt Actions) the proposal draft does include a namespace; would be useful to see if Core is OK with that choice or wants a different one. The "images not showing" problem may be a website issue, I've asked the webmaster to look at something suspect I found this morning. agenda += (new topic, potentially related to vocabulary guidance work) I've been working on some tools to help with spec authoring - specifically the resource definition tables. In the course of that, I've come across the need for some extension properties (2, so far). It would be convenient to have a properly allocated namespace for those, even if it's not mature enough to work deeply in public just yet (I want to have prototype working first, and it's not there yet). Best Regards, John Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario _______________________________________________ Oslc-Core mailing list [email protected] http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net
