Finding out whether the preconditions are in place is just a question of
a few minutes. By the way, its the chore of the sponsor to find out
whether they are in place. I mean, it might be nice for me to see them
in place but unless the sponsor is convinced that does not have much
meaning. I have not run into a sponsor yet, that was not able to quickly
check, whether they do exist.
The one prerequisite that can in a certain way be expanded on is diversity...and, of course, its essential for open space or selforganisation or life itself. Sponsors immediately buy into that and mostly get interested in doing something to expand on diversity, such as inviting their customers or employers that are important for the graduates of their school. All this stuff around prerequisites is part of the "contact meeting" which I consider one of "my" prerequisites before getting into "contract" negotiations...it rarely lasts more than 1,5 hours and has the characteristics of a "consulting" session after which we part, sleep a couple of times and tell each other if we want to work together or not. By "my prerequisite" I mean that I will not collaborate with a sponsor unless I have a contact meeting with him (its free, no strings attached). I wonder what kind of prerequisites some of you new and old hands have for getting into OST-adventures?
Greetings from Berlin
mmp


Harrison Owen schrieb:
I second Michael's observations in terms of speed of start and it has
everything to do with the essential preconditions for Open Space
(which also happen to be the essential preconditions for self
organization). The conditions are: real business issue that people
really care about, lots of diversity, lots of complexity, plenty of
passion and conflict, and a genuine sense of urgency. Given these
preconditions I have never seen any difference between organizations
and groups, be they old, new, established, emergent, hierarchical,
libertarians, conservative, or whatever. Fabricating these conditions
is neither possible or useful -- but making sure that they exist is
an essential piece of pre-work. But it needn't be a lengthy, involved
enterprise. In fact if you have to work/look to hard that would be a
pretty good indication that the conditions are not present.

Harrison

Harrison Owen 7808 River Falls Dr. Potomac, MD 20854 USA Phone
301-365-2093 www.openspaceworld.com www.ho-image.com (Personal
Website) To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the
archives of [email protected]: http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

-----Original Message----- From: OSLIST
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael M
Pannwitz Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 8:18 AM To:
[email protected] Subject: Re: Shy people... (?) (or shy
systems...?)

Dear m, the opportunities for participants to post issues in my
practice are:

--during the regular posting issues session at the beginning of the
os --just after the regular posting session and all the time thereafter--the black markers are replaced by red markers while
people are in the market phase so that issues posted after the
regular posting session stick out --during Evening News of Day 1
(here the "red" issues can be pointed to and "explained" by the
conveners and furthr issues can be posted) --during Morning
Announcements of Day 2

In this way, a 2-day (or 3 day event with Action Planning on Day 3) event has three "official" times for posting issues compared to one
time in one-day events.

As far as "speed" os posting is concerned (I think its mostly a worry
of facilitators and sponsors) I observe that it is directly related
to two factors: it feels and looks faster and more "natural" the more
 completely the 5 preconditions are in place (you mention diversity
as one of them) and the more work for all aspects of the Open Space
Event were done by the sponsor and his planning group in the
preparation for the event.

In closing circles I now actually expect and will always hear some participants express their wonder on how it was possible for them to
 speak in the Open Space setting, something they had never been able
to do (speak up in groups)...this is so for gradeschool kids (I wish
we could have this in our school) and every other category including
people in my age bracket...this happens under the experimental
conditions described and my hunch is that it is just another one of
the side effects of selforganisation expressing itself.



Greetings from Berlin mmp

Michael Herman schrieb:
you remind me, peggy, that perhaps the slowest opening i can
remember was in asia (singapore) and then there was a region
montessori educators conference where i actually have video of the
first several people literally running for the markers, from the
edge of a circle of 250.  also, that the breadth of the question
makes a difference, as it sets up that situation you describe, not
knowing what/how to post.  the other thing that helps create that
condition is significant diversity where people don't (yet) share
much history... so they don't necessarily know each other's
language, so to speak.  that's when even more than butterflies, it
helps to have a second day, so that morning news can invite new
topics.  by then, people have been able to connect enough to know
how to express their issue in words that other will understand.

m



--

Michael Herman Michael Herman Associates

http://MichaelHerman.com http://RonanParkTrail.com http://ManorNeighbors.com http://ChicagoConservationCorps.org http://OpenSpaceWorld.org

312-280-7838 (mobile)


On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Peggy Holman <[email protected]>wrote:

Jon,

Thanks for the marvelous summary of the many aspects of shyness
or other qualities posing as shyness.  So much wisdom!  I've got
a few small items to add to all that's been said.

I've noticed that the more hierarchical the organization, the
longer it seems to takes before someone steps in to post a
session.  Have others noticed that?  I suspect to Michael
Herman's point, it has much to do with how real people sense the
invitation is.

As several have already said, the quality of the space -- knowing
who and what is welcome - matters.

I did an Open Space with Buddhist monks years ago.  It's the
longest I've ever seen it take before someone stepped in.  Once
I'd opened the space, we all sat breathing for several minutes.
At least it seemed like several minutes.  Ultimately the youngest
monk in the room posted a session.  Once the ice was broken,
there was a rush to the center.

A few years later, with a group of journalists, they entered the
circle one at a time, trickling in ever so slooowly.  One "shy"
journalist waited until people had headed to their sessions.  He
then went to the wall and added his session, never announcing it.
Since most people go back to check the agenda, his session was
there for all to see.

On a completely different note, sometimes I think shyness is a
result of not quite knowing how to express a notion.  If someone
doesn't know how to say what they want, how can they possibly
post a session?  I find that's one of the great values of
butterflies.  Often those nagging ideas that we can't quite put
into words get worked through in an intimate side conversation. With a bit more clarity, someone finds their voice and posts a
session later in the day or the following day.  That's part of
why I prefer multiple day OS gatherings.  So many seeds get
planted on the first day that get a chance to show themselves on
day two.

Thanks for sparking a great exchange, Peggy


_________________________________ Peggy Holman [email protected]

15347 SE 49th Place Bellevue, WA 98006 425-746-6274 www.peggyholman.com www.journalismthatmatters.org

Coming in September Engaging Emergence: Turning Upheaval into
Opportunity www.engagingemergence.com

For the second edition of The Change Handbook, go to: www.bkconnection.com/ChangeHandbook

"An angel told me that the only way to step into the fire and not
get burnt, is to become the fire". -- Drew Dellinger








On Jul 22, 2010, at 10:09 AM, Jon Harvey wrote:

Thank you all for your wisdom and experience. I had a feeling my
inquiry would tap into a rich seam of insights and practice...
But where to begin to respond...! I will take the points in the
order they appear in my email intray:

*Mamading*: we meet again! (Were you there on Tuesday at NESTA
btw – you may not have spotted me hiding behind a couple
croissants with Emmental cheese in them?!) Do tell us more about
these Labs. And, I think implicit, in your comment is an idea
that people and organisations / partnerships / systems /
communities can make more of OS on a second, third, fourth visit etc. I know that to be true.

*Barry*: the ‘shy’ (and more of that later) people may well hang
back and butterfly, but sometimes butterflies don’t tap into
their own passion and can drift off – actually or mentally or
both. I know, que sera, sera (whatever happens etc.) – but your
comment has prompted me to spend more next time working with the
sponsor. (Yes these reflections do all come from a recent
experience.) The sponsor needs to be as relaxed as I am with the magic of the process.

*Jack*: things are good thanks – *bleating* (blogging & tweeting
combined – term coined by my wife to refer to my activity in my
study / garret) like mad to get OS & whole system stuff woven
into the fabric of the #bigsociety. I like the idea of a living
agenda wall that can ebb and flow – and indeed try to practice
this. Perhaps this Agenda Wall 2.0....? (sort of! – although it
always has been) But I also hear what Lisa says in her later
mail.

*Harrison*: Not for the first time, I do wish I could have you as
an app on my smart phone so that I could tap ‘you’ and get an
immediate response of ‘this is what Harrison would do / say!’
Thank you for your story – you are so good at those – I will
endeavour to imbibe fully and remember at a suitable later date.
And you are right of course, it *is* about passion. I guess I
remain interested in what there can be in the system (see below)
or zeitgeist present whereby people with passion do *not* come
forward... and as a facilitator what role I have (if any) in
‘tweaking’ the system in advance of the OS process...

*Michael*: you are correct of course – it is rarely about
‘shyness’ or the individuals themselves. Indeed it was my
reflection on the recent series of OS that I did – that, in part,
there was some ‘leaden’ systemic cultures present. And quiet is
not shy – absolutely true! And there has to be a first meeting so
that there can be a second – when people might ‘dare’ a little more. As always every OS is a success – but (and back to my
earlier point) – just what that success looks like may not be
quite what the sponsor had in mind – which touches on my role as
preparation guide. Their role as ‘inviter’ and ‘open space pilot’
is of course critical.

*Phelim*: I agree, there are some very practical things we can
say – I like your phrases. Again I will seek to imbibe those.
Certainly I always aim to ‘be’ and ‘hold the space’ with a gentle
and almost wispy presence – quietly content with the silence. (My
father had a piece of gristle on one ear which made it look a
little pointed and he would claim he was half pixie. So, as a
quarter pixie, I try to have a wispy presence...! ) For me making it easy is a stepping back not a stepping forward. And as
for the number of sessions – in one OS of the recent series, a
total of two sessions were proposed... so near perfect success!
It was surprising! The chocolate was good as well.

*Sharon*: You are right – exploring the passion beforehand is
critical. In hindsight, the sponsor was surprised by where the
passion was after the first OS – he (and therefore I as he had
briefed me) expected a different quality of passion to one that
we in fact experienced. On reflection, I now know it would have
been wiser to hear a few more of the ‘ordinary’ voices beforehand. And working through to what is the ‘right’ issue /
theme / question is really, really important.

*Lisa*: Given all of the above, I value your assertion that there
can be some,  a small amount perhaps, shyness amongst some
people. I think I can sometimes overlook how ‘heavy’ a microphone
is for some people. Maybe I am not alone in this – although maybe
I am. Can you post your ‘face’ on youtube?! But I think I can
imagine it from your description. I do have my ‘face’ too.
(Although there is another debate to be had about where we go after the intro stuff. I usually step outside the circle –
whereas from what you say, I am imagining you sitting in the
circle...???) I need to keep reminding myself that there is solid
presence in silence. Being an extravert – I may not always see
this. And thank you for highlighting the issue of power which
others have touched on too.

So again – thank you all for this online tutorial. I feel
enriched and empowered – and not a little renewed too!

A sprinkling of pixie dust to you all!

Jon


_______________________________________________________________________________


*Jon Harvey* Director

" www.jonharveyassociates.co.uk

( +44 (0) 7771 537535 ( +44 (0) 1280 822585 *›** *
[email protected] *¹**  **Skype*: jonsharvey**

*Helping you connect the prose and the passion* *to deliver
superlative results*

http://smallcreativeideas.blogspot.com/  for ideas about how to
improve the efficiency & effectiveness of public & third sector
services http://jonharveyassociates.blogspot.com/ for articles &
ideas about leadership and organisational change from a whole
systems perspective http://twitter.com/JonSHarvey for
conversations, ideas & questions to help build a more ambitious,
creative and fair world http://tinyurl.com/JonHarveyLI to connect
with me on LinkedIn


*Jon Harvey Associates Ltd* *Registered Office: Chandos House,
School Lane, Buckingham, MK18 1HD* *Company Number 6661588. VAT
Registration Number 936 2921 11*

*Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Thank you.* *All business mileage is offset with
**http://www.carbon-clear.com*<http://www.carbon-clear.com/uk/index.php>








* * ========================================================== [email protected] ------------------------------ To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of [email protected]: http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html To learn
about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist


* * ========================================================== [email protected] ------------------------------ To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of [email protected]: http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html To learn
about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist

* * ========================================================== [email protected] ------------------------------ To
subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of
[email protected]: http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs: http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist



--
Michael M Pannwitz, boscop eg
Draisweg 1, 12209 Berlin, Germany
++49-30-772 8000
[email protected]
www.boscop.org


Check out the Open Space World Map presently showing 398 resident Open
Space Workers in 69 countries working in a total of 141 countries worldwide
Have a look:
www.openspaceworldmap.org

*
*
==========================================================
[email protected]
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of [email protected]:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist

Reply via email to